Getting assessed · 4.2

What counts as evidence

What counts as evidence. What the requirement says, what it means in practice, and what an assessor will ask.

For an independent reference point, see The Cyber AB.

Three kinds

What an assessor accepts

Documentation. The plan, the policies, the procedures. Establishes what is supposed to happen.

Interview. Asking the people who do the work. Establishes what they understand to happen.

Observation and artefact. Watching the thing, or examining an export, a log, a screenshot, a signed record. Establishes what does happen.

Assessments use all three and the strength of the conclusion comes from their agreement.

The consistency test

Where assessments actually turn

The policy says quarterly access reviews. The compliance owner says they happen. The evidence shows two in eighteen months. That disagreement is the finding, and it is more damaging than a control honestly recorded as not yet implemented.

Which means the useful preparation is not polishing the documents. It is checking that the documents, the people and the records tell the same story.

What does not count

Four things offered as evidence that are not

An assurance. That the control operates, from somebody credible, with nothing behind it.

A policy alone. A statement of intent is documentation, not proof of operation.

A capability. That the system can do this, shown in a settings page, without a record that it did.

A single instance. One screenshot from today for a control that should have operated monthly for a year.

Over a period

The property that cannot be created late

Most requirements concern something that happens repeatedly. The evidence therefore covers a span: twelve months of review records, a year of logs, a sequence of dated approvals.

No amount of effort in the final month produces a year of history, which is why the blog entry on running this as a project emphasises that the deliverable cannot be compressed at the end.

Properties of a good artefact

Four

Dated. Attributable to a person or a system. Unaltered, or alterable only in a recorded way. And intelligible to somebody who does not work here.

The last is the one that fails: an export nobody outside the team can read requires a translator, and the translator is the person being assessed.

Collecting it

Monthly, into one place

The habit from the blog entry on staying compliant. An hour, a folder organised by requirement rather than by system, and a note of what was added.

Organised by requirement is deliberate: it is how the assessor works and it means one artefact can be referenced against several requirements without duplication.

Sensitive evidence

What you can show and how

Some evidence contains information you would rather not hand over, including personal data and security configuration. Redaction is acceptable, showing on screen rather than providing a copy is acceptable, and refusing outright is not.

Agree the approach with the assessor beforehand rather than negotiating it in the room.

Also

Elsewhere in getting assessed