Getting assessed · 4.5

What the assessment week is like

What the assessment week is like. What the requirement says, what it means in practice, and what an assessor will ask.

For an independent reference point, see ISO/IEC 27001 overview.

Before it starts

Four things settled in advance

The scope, agreed in writing, so that no morning is lost to a disagreement about what is being examined. The documents, sent when asked and in the format asked for. The people, booked, including somebody from the floor. And the rooms, the access passes and the network arrangements for the assessors.

None of that affects the outcome directly and all of it affects the impression formed in the first hour.

How it runs

The shape of the week

An opening meeting covering scope, method and logistics. Document review. Interviews with the people who operate the controls. Observation, including walking the floor. A debrief at the end of each day. A closing meeting with the preliminary findings.

The daily debriefs are the part suppliers underuse. They preview what is emerging, and a misunderstanding corrected on Tuesday costs nothing while the same one corrected at the closeout is already in a draft.

Interviews

Prepare people, do not script them

Tell them what to expect, that questions are about how the work is actually done, and that saying "I do not know, that is Sarah's area" is a good answer rather than a failure.

Scripted answers are audible and they invite a follow-up question the script does not cover. An operator describing what they genuinely do, even where it differs slightly from the procedure, produces a manageable finding; the same operator reciting the procedure and then contradicting it under a second question produces a worse one.

On the floor

They will walk it

And they will look at what is on benches, what is on screens, where the drawings are, whether the cabinet is locked and what is in the recycling.

The entry on printed media is the preparation for this and the walk usually confirms whatever the paper practices actually are.

Behaviour

Clarify, do not argue

Where an assessor has misunderstood something, explain and provide the evidence. Where they have understood correctly and you disagree with the conclusion, say so once, record it, and move on.

Arguing consumes time you need and changes nothing. Assessors are examining against a standard rather than negotiating.

Producing evidence quickly

Where the index pays for itself

A request answered in two minutes from an index, rather than in two hours by a search, changes the pace of the whole week and the number of things that get examined properly.

It also signals an organisation that knows where its records are, which is the impression the assessment is partly forming.

What goes wrong

Three recurring problems

A key person unavailable, because the week was booked without them. Evidence that exists and cannot be found. And somebody contradicting the plan, which is the consistency failure the entry on evidence describes.

All three are prevented in the fortnight before rather than during the week.

Also

Elsewhere in getting assessed