People · 3.4

Hiring for a role most suppliers have never filled

Hiring for a role most suppliers have never filled. What it costs, who decides, and what usually goes wrong.

For an independent reference point, see NIST Privacy Framework.

The role

What you are hiring for

Somebody to own the programme described in the entry on ownership: a named person with time and authority who can make records happen.

The confusion to avoid is between security and compliance. A security engineer configures controls. A compliance owner defines scope, writes the plan, chases evidence and faces the assessor. Both are useful and they are different jobs, and job advertisements routinely ask for one and describe the other.

What to look for

Four things, in order

Experience of being audited. Quality, aerospace or medical device backgrounds all supply this. Somebody who has faced an external auditor understands what evidence is in a way that cannot be taught quickly.

Ability to write. Most of the deliverable is documents that a stranger has to follow. This is rarer than it should be and it is testable in an interview.

Willingness to be unpopular. The role requires telling production that something must be recorded, and telling a director that a change cannot proceed.

Enough technical fluency to ask. Not to configure: to understand an answer and to notice when one is evasive.

Certifications

What they signal

They signal that somebody studied a body of knowledge and passed an examination, which is real and is not the same as having run a programme. Treat them as a filter for a shortlist rather than as the decision.

Where a certification is genuinely required by a customer or a framework, that is a different matter and will be stated in the requirement.

The market

It is small, and everybody is hiring from it

Demand for people who have done this exceeds supply, particularly outside major cities and particularly for manufacturers who cannot match technology salaries.

Which argues for the alternative below rather than for a longer search.

Growing somebody

Frequently the better option

Take somebody who already knows the business, already has the audit instinct and already has standing with production, and buy the specialist knowledge around them: training, a consultant by the day, a mentor.

They will be slower for six months and better afterwards, because the part that cannot be bought is knowing how this business actually works and being trusted by the people in it.

Interview questions that work

Three

Describe a time you had to get a record kept that nobody wanted to keep. What did you do when an auditor asked for something you did not have? Tell me how you would find out what actually happens on our shop floor.

The third separates people who would read the procedures from people who would go and look.

Part-time and fractional

A real option for a small supplier

An experienced compliance owner two days a week, with an internal person holding the day-to-day, works and is common. What does not work is a fractional owner with no internal counterpart, because the internal authority the role needs cannot be exercised by somebody who is not there.

What to pay

Benchmark against quality, not against security

Pitching the salary against technology market rates makes the role look unaffordable; pitching it against senior quality roles, which is what it most resembles in a manufacturer, makes it achievable and is defensible internally.

The first ninety days

What a new owner should do

Read the contracts. Walk the floor. Find the evidence, wherever it is. Meet the sponsor and agree the monthly slot. And produce one document that did not exist before, so that the role has visibly started.

Also

Elsewhere in people